On *THAT* Telegraph Article – Portrayal of SEX in YA

This morning (afternoon?), Twitter has been ablaze with talk of an article that was published in the Telegraph attacking the Zoella Book Club choices because of their portrayal of sex.

If you haven’t given it a read, you can find it here.


The gist of the article is that these books are BAD for teenage girls because of the way they portray sex.

The article labels all YA literature as ‘fluffy, joyful escapism’ when, in reality, a lot of the books on the list deal with mental health issues, and are a little more serious and well researched than a smutty romance novel. The idea that YA readers are reading absolute fluff is an outdated one – the genre is incredibly diverse and pioneering, and many recent books have been a little harrowing. While ‘sick lit’ has been demonised in the press, the explosion of books surrounding mental health issues and including LGBT characters has simply, to my knowledge, not been echoed in the wider fiction market.

A lot of the books I’ve recently read in YA are not fluffy romances – they’re tackling difficult issues, ones that simply aren’t discussed in mainstream education.

That’s not to say that the author of this article is wrong. The portrayal of virginity and slut-shaming in YA still has far to go, but the problem doesn’t lie with any one individual book. Just like the ‘dark romance’ days of YA normalised the idea that a dark, mysterious bad boy  is probably a secret sweetheart who will win your father’s affection and then also turn you into a vampire, portrayal of virginity as a whole as a ‘gift’ and something you can ‘lose’ to someone else – the idea that your sexual identity is something someone else can alter and take away from you – is still problematic.


Again, it isn’t the fault of just one book, but when the media, your culture, even your religion is telling you that virginity is something you shouldn’t consider losing lightly, and that you should only give to someone special (despite the same sources telling boys the opposite), it’s no wonder many girls make a huge deal out of it. That isn’t YA’s fault (and it isn’t necessarily a problem), but YA could do more to change the rhetoric. It’s an uphill battle against pretty much all other forms of media, but if YA is anything, it is progressive.

We unfortunately live in a society which teaches girls that sex should be painful for them, that they won’t enjoy it, and the only thing that matter is that the man ejaculates. That isn’t the fault of YA, it’s a problem with society itself.

On the other hand, we often see dream-like portrayals of sex in contemporary romance (fantasy romance like ACOMAF gets a free pass in my book) where first-time sex is a brilliant unity of souls culminating in an explosive (but definitely not sticky!) simultaneous orgasm. This, again, is problematic, but in a different way.


(I’d also like to say that virginity is an interesting concept when it comes to non-heterosexual couples, which are often ignored in the general media, but I do feel YA is getting there with LGBT representation. It isn’t perfect, and I would LOVE to see virginity dealt with in a book about LGBT characters – if you know any books that do deal with this, let me know!)


Back to the article, I agree with Emma Oulton’s comments that teenage girls are being failed a proper sex education (in fact, I feel like PSHE itself is completely lacking – we need better mental health education, better political education and better health education in general – especially women’s health, periods and the like) and Young Adult literature is an art form that can help tackle this chronic miseducation. The Zoella Book Club choices are a little narrow (in that they tend to focus on mental health issues, and there is no inclusion of LGBT characters, for example), but I do honestly feel that future book clubs could diversify, and there would have been outrage against these books if they dealt with some of the more controversial topics that often feature in YA (for example, Louise O’Neill’s brilliant Asking For It).


At the end of the day, Zoella  has a brilliant opportunity to bring books to the masses of teenage girls that focus on some hard-hitting issues. The books she has chosen aren’t ‘fluffy’, and it’s improper to attack the authors of these books for one sentence in their work – but on the other hand, we as a genre need to be addressing the issue that is the portrayal of virginity ( as well as many other important portrayals), and we have a brilliant opportunity to fight back against the lack of education on these topics.

What are your thoughts on the article? Have you read any of the Zoella Book Club choices? Tweet me at @annalisebooks or comment below!

Annalise x


  1. Ahhh I love this post! I totally agree with every point that you made. I think that there are still areas in which YA can improve in terms of portrayals of sex/virginity/sexuality but you’re so right in saying that YA is leading the way in so many areas. The idea that YA is nothing more than dumbed down adult fic for the teen market enrages me. Thoughtful and articulate post! 🙂 x

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Yes, I agree with all of this!

    It was weird, I read the article and I agreed with a lot of the stuff the journalist said; the stuff about not having enough sex education, the themes in a lot of YA books that are layered with sprinkles of misogyny (bad boy abusive relationships, becoming a lesser person when losing your virginity etc) but yes, the article was so widely under-researched and I think really missed the point of a lot of these YA books. I mean, did she even read them??

    I’ve read Fangirl and The Sky Is Everywhere from the book club. I can’t remember Fangirl that well (it was a long time ago) but The Sky Is Everywhere is NOT “fluffy” at all! It’s a very serious portrayal of becoming a sexual person AND coming to terms with death.

    I do have problems with the book club, which is basically lack of LGBT and POC characters. Also, genres too. Contemporary is great but a little fantasy and sci-fi wouldn’t have hurt! Great post, Annalise! 😀

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I was a little worried about writing this, simply because I read the article, agreed with it, and then everyone was saying how terrible it was! I think the books chosen weren’t fluffy at all, but hopefully there will be more diversity in the future book clubs and we can touch on other important issues – she could definitely have chosen some much worse books (even some ‘fluffy’ ones)!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. You have perfectly articulated EXACTLY what I was feeling when I read this article! I hadn’t come across it until I read the title of your post (it’s been a mental week and my twittering has suffered) but I went and read it and was like “am I supposed to be hating this? Because I kinda agree with it!” That is to say the virginity part. i feel that it is wrong for the writer to label YA as a whole for doing this as it isn’t always the case. I wrote my discursive essay for my Advanced Higher English coursework on the prejudice against YA and why it’s a good thing and in my research I came across a lot of similar opinions. One thing I will say, however, and I may be very wrong, is that I feel that the majorit of Zoella’s audience (though certainly not all) is made up of younger teeenagers and pre teens (like 10-14) as well as having a variety of older watchers too. Some of the chosen books, my examples being Fangirl and We Were Liars as the only two I have read, might be a bit old for this audience? However this is not to say the other’s aren’t appropriate, I wouldn’t know.
    That article was certainly thought provoking.
    Sorry really long winded reply! Brilliant post though!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s